Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Week#2 – Analysis

CASE STUDY – Critical Thinking
 
 
Premises:
  • because it was the mothers mistake was to give her son a car while he is a new driver therefore.
  • because police ad a reason to stop him because he was driving badly.
  • because the large number of accident with this kind of cars while negotiating a sharp curve, the manufacturer has a responsibility.

 Therefore we recommend the police is not guilty but the mother is wrong when she let him go out and drive when he just got his license.
Posted by at

6 comments:

  1. Unknown3 March 2015 at 21:28

    good points of premises and nice conclusion .

    Aouf

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown3 March 2015 at 21:29

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unknown3 March 2015 at 21:35

    very good premises that ends up with interesting recommendation

    abdulla ali

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unknown15 March 2015 at 05:59

    You have good premises. I also agree with your verdict that it is the mothers fault.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Unknown15 March 2015 at 11:39

    Well done Musaaed

    But I think the mother is not guilty because her son has a driving license so, he should know how to drives in anytime and to drive in a safe way not too fast or in a dangerous way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unknown23 March 2015 at 10:57

    Thanks Abdulrahman :)

    I still think I am right, because:
    She know her son is a new driver if she want give him the car she must go with her son becuse he is a new driver.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)